Ramos v. USA

Filing 17

ORDER. ORDERED that the "Motion of Recusal of All Judges in the District of Colorado for the Specific Matter of the Claim of Unconstitutionality of Local Rule 8.1" 13 and "Motion of Recusal of Senior Judge Lewis T[.] Babcock" [1 6] are denied. FURTHER ORDERED that the "Motion to Reconsider Order Overruling Objection of July 13th 2011" 12 is granted only to the extent Mr. Ramos seeks reconsideration of the 7/13/11 order denying him leave to comply with 28 U.S.C. & #167; 1746 in lieu of the notary requirement for his in forma pauperis motion and to the extent he seeks one final opportunity to comply with the remaining deficiency, i.e., his failure to file his complaint on the proper, Court-approved form. FURTHE R ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the "Motion Requesting Third Extension of Time to Comply With Order to Cure Deficiency of April 29th 2011" 14 is granted for 20 days onl y. FURTHER ORDERED that the "Notice of Claim of Unconstitutionality of Local Rule 8.1" 15 will not be further addressed because the 6/8/11 minute order already informed Mr. Ramos that D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1A. requires that "[a] pro se party shall use the forms established by the court." ORDERED that Mr. Ramos file an amended complaint on the proper, Court approved form within 20 days from the date of this order, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/25/11.(lygsl, )