Hankins v. Milyard
FINAL JUDGMENT. re 74 by clerk on 2/23/2016. (dhans, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01090-WJM
TERENCE J. HANKINS,
KEVIN MILYARED, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and the Order
On Application For Writ Of Habeas Corpus, entered by the Honorable William J.
Martínez, United States District Judge, on February 23, 2016, it is
ORDERED that Applicant Terence J. Hankins’ Application for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Application”) (ECF No. 6) is DENIED and the
civil action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear his own costs and attorney’s
fees. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because
Applicant Terence J. Hankins has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)
that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma
pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $505
appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 24.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 23rd day of February, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/Deborah Hansen
Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?