Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 15

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 7/21/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Retaliation Under Title VII, filed July 18, 2011 13 , is granted. Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), filed June 24, 2011 10 , is moot. Scheduling Order approved.(FTR: L. Galera) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: July 21, 2011 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Laura Galera ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 11-cv-01102-RPM DEBRA CURTIS, Sander N. Karp Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Steven W. Moore Stacy D. Mueller Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Scheduling Conference 11:20 a.m. Court in session. Discussion regarding case facts, discovery and related case. Mr. Karp states plaintiff received unemployment benefits, incontested. Court states its view regarding the use of requests for admissions and claims interrogatories. Court advises counsel to not attach email communications between counsel (privilege) to filed discovery dispute pleadings. Court instructs counsel to avoid duplication with respect to depositions (related case). ORDERED: Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Retaliation Under Title VII, filed July 18, 2011 [13], is granted. ORDERED: Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), filed June 24, 2011 [10], is moot. ORDERED: Scheduling Order approved. 11:40 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 20 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?