Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
15
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 7/21/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Retaliation Under Title VII, filed July 18, 2011 13 , is granted. Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), filed June 24, 2011 10 , is moot. Scheduling Order approved.(FTR: L. Galera) (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
July 21, 2011
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Laura Galera
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01102-RPM
DEBRA CURTIS,
Sander N. Karp
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Steven W. Moore
Stacy D. Mueller
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Scheduling Conference
11:20 a.m.
Court in session.
Discussion regarding case facts, discovery and related case.
Mr. Karp states plaintiff received unemployment benefits, incontested.
Court states its view regarding the use of requests for admissions and claims interrogatories.
Court advises counsel to not attach email communications between counsel (privilege) to filed discovery
dispute pleadings.
Court instructs counsel to avoid duplication with respect to depositions (related case).
ORDERED:
Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Retaliation Under Title VII, filed
July 18, 2011 [13], is granted.
ORDERED:
Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), filed June 24, 2011
[10], is moot.
ORDERED:
Scheduling Order approved.
11:40 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 20 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?