Shire LLC et al v. Sandoz Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P 16. Rule 16 Hearing set for 7/22/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/13/11. (mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 11-cv-01110-PAB SHIRE LLC, SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMY F.T. ARNSTEN, PH.D., PASKO RAKIC, M.D., and ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D., Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ INC., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16 _____________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court upon a Complaint filed by the Plaintiffs alleging the infringement of a patent. In light thereof, a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is appropriate. It is ORDERED that: 1. A hearing is set for July 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A701 at the United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel shall bring their calendars. This is not a scheduling conference. The parties should not submit a proposed scheduling order. 2. Prior to the hearing, the parties shall meet and confer about the following issues and be prepared to address them at the hearing: • Whether there are issues of claim construction. • • • • Whether a hearing will be required under Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996). If a Markman hearing is required, whether discovery is necessary prior to such hearing. If so, what discovery is required. (This hearing does not substitute for a scheduling conference before the Magistrate Judge.) Whether there are any other issues or impediments to the setting of a Markman hearing. Other appropriate issues enumerated in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c). DATED May 13, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?