Shire LLC et al v. Sandoz Inc.

Filing 85

ORDER re: 84 Status Report Regarding Claim Construction. The Court adopts the schedule proposed by the defendant, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/6/11. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable R. Brooke Jackson Civil Action No. 11-cv-01110-RBJ-KMT SHIRE LLC, SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SHIRE DEVELOPMENT INC., SHIRE INTERNATIONAL LICENSING B.V. AMY F.T. ARNSTEN, PH.D., PASKO RAKIC, M.D., and ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D. Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ INC. Defendant. ORDER As directed by the magistrate judge, the parties have filed their “Status Report Regarding Claim Construction.” They do not agree on a schedule. Having reviewed their respective positions, the Court adopts the schedule proposed by the defendant. As attractive as it might be to have the views of other courts on the construction of the same terms, the Court finds that the plaintiffs’ proposed schedule creates the potential for delay that is potentially unfair to the defendant, which is not a party to the cases pending in Delaware, West Virginia and California, and not consistent with this Court’s view of the efficient administration of the case. DATED this 6th day of December, 2011. BY THE COURT: ___________________________________ R. Brooke Jackson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?