Shire LLC et al v. Sandoz Inc.
ORDER re: 84 Status Report Regarding Claim Construction. The Court adopts the schedule proposed by the defendant, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/6/11. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable R. Brooke Jackson
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01110-RBJ-KMT
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
SHIRE DEVELOPMENT INC.,
SHIRE INTERNATIONAL LICENSING B.V.
AMY F.T. ARNSTEN, PH.D.,
PASKO RAKIC, M.D., and
ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D.
As directed by the magistrate judge, the parties have filed their “Status Report Regarding
Claim Construction.” They do not agree on a schedule. Having reviewed their respective
positions, the Court adopts the schedule proposed by the defendant. As attractive as it might be
to have the views of other courts on the construction of the same terms, the Court finds that the
plaintiffs’ proposed schedule creates the potential for delay that is potentially unfair to the
defendant, which is not a party to the cases pending in Delaware, West Virginia and California,
and not consistent with this Court’s view of the efficient administration of the case.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
R. Brooke Jackson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?