Lynch v. Barrett et al

Filing 42

MINUTE ENTRY for Status Conference held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/16/2012.Granting 37 Motion to Strike; Denying 12 Motion to Dismiss. (Court Reporter: Kara Spitler) (lag)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera Court Reporter: Kara Spitler Date: February 16, 2012 Civil Action No. 11-cv-01120-RBJ-MEH Parties: Counsel: NICK LYNCH, Robert M. Liechty Plaintiff, v. ADAM BARRETT, STEPHEN KENFIELD, MICHAEL MORELOCK, ABBEGAYLE DORN, and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, L. Douglas Jewell Reid Elkus Wendy J. Shea Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES STATUS CONFERENCE 1:59 p.m. Court in Session. Opening remarks by the Court. Argument by Mr. Liechty and Ms. Shea as to the Motion to Strike Untimely Expert Designations or in the Alternative to Amend Scheduling Order Deadlines and Continue Trial Date Doc.#[37]. Discussion regarding the deposition testimony of Officer Dorn. For the reasons as stated on the record it is: ORDERED: The Motion to Dismiss Doc.# [12] is DENIED subject to the findings made on the record. The Court tentatively denies the judicial estoppel motion pending review of the deposition testimony and the videotaped statement. ORDERED: Motion to Strike Untimely Expert Designations or in the Alternative to Amend Scheduling Order Deadlines and Continue Trial Date Doc.#[37]. is GRANTED. Given the Court’s ruling, Mr. Liechty requests the identified doctors be allowed to testify as nonexperts. Ms. Shea has no objection as long as the doctors do not provide any opinions as to causation. ORDERED: The identified doctors can testify they saw the patient, what they did to treat or diagnose him, and what treatment they prescribed as a treating physician. They can not express opinions beyond that. 2:50 p.m. Court in Recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 00:51 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?