Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. v. Concrete Sidewalk Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting 74 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties' Settlement Agreement By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/29/11. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of defendants' claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.(jjpsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 11-cv-01123-PAB-MEH PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a Sidewalk Shavers of Colorado, a Colorado corporation, and J. SCOTT LAUDENSLAUGER, an individual, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. AARON OLLIVIER, Counterclaim defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties’ Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 74]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. Upon the consent of the parties, and in light of the settlement reached in this case, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties’ Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 74] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of defendants’ claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. DATED November 29, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?