Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. v. Concrete Sidewalk Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
75
ORDER granting 74 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties' Settlement Agreement By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/29/11. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of defendants' claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.(jjpsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01123-PAB-MEH
PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING, INC.,
a Utah corporation,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SOLUTIONS, INC.,
d/b/a Sidewalk Shavers of Colorado, a Colorado corporation, and
J. SCOTT LAUDENSLAUGER, an individual,
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
v.
AARON OLLIVIER,
Counterclaim defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss All Plead
Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the
Parties’ Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 74]. The Court has reviewed the pleading
and is fully advised in the premises. Upon the consent of the parties, and in light of the
settlement reached in this case, it is
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss All Plead Claims and
Counterclaims Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the Parties’
Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 74] is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of defendants’ claims and
counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.
DATED November 29, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?