Fernandez v. John Peroulis & Sons Sheep, Inc. et al
Filing
44
ORDER. The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Intervenor 43 is GRANTED. The intervenor, The United States of America, is DISMISSED. The intervenor, The United States of America, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/19/2011.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01132-REB-CBS
JHOSEMAR SAMANIEGO FERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN PEROULIS & SONS SHEEP, INC., a foreign corporation of Colorado,
LOUIS PEROULIS, and
STANLEY PEROULIS,
Defendants.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant Intervenor.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO INTERVENOR,
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ONLY
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Intervenor [#43]1
filed December 16, 2011. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the
motion should be granted and that the intervenor, The United States of America, should
be dismissed.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Intervenor [#43]2 filed December
1
“[#43]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
2
“[#43]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
16, 2011, is GRANTED;
2. That the intervenor, The United States of America, is DISMISSED; and
3. That the intervenor, The United States of America, is DROPPED as a named
party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated December 19, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?