Wild et al v. H&R Block, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation of Dismissal, With Prejudice 34 is APPROVED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/14/2011. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01146-REB-KLM
LINDA L. WILD, a Colorado resident,
ADVANTAGE TAX SOLUTIONS, INC., a Colorado corporation,
CHRIS CASSON, a Colorado resident,
GILBERT VIGIL, a Colorado resident,
PHIL LORING, JR., a Colorado resident,
DEBORAH E. SCHMIDT, a Colorado resident,
TODD H. SHANNON, a Colorado resident,
JEANNINE HARDING, a Colorado resident, and
KEVIN POLANSKY, a Colorado resident,
Plaintiffs,
v.
H&R BLOCK, INC., a Missouri corporation,
H&R BLOCK TAX SERVICES, INC., a Missouri corporation,
H&R BLOCK ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company,
H&R BLOCK SERVICES, INC., a Missouri corporation, and
HRB TAX GROUP, INC., a Missouri corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Dismissal, With Prejudice [#34]1
filed September 13, 2011. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I have concluded
that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with
prejudice.

1

“[#34]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Stipulation of Dismissal, With Prejudice [#34] filed September 13,
2011, is APPROVED;
2. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and
3. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay
their own attorney fees and costs.
Dated September 14, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2