Smith v. Southwest Construction Supply & Sales, Inc. et al

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER denying 22 Motion (Letter) for Order/Release regarding Seizure of Property. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/12.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01245-REB-MEH
CARLOS SMITH, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHWEST CONSTRUTION (sic) SUPPLY & SALES, INC., a Colorado corporation, and
PAUL FLORES, an individual,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 9, 2012.
Pending before the Court is a letter from Plaintiff dated August 7, 2012 [filed August 7,
2012; docket #22] which the Court construes a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Plaintiff’s
motion is denied without prejudice for failure to comply Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D) and D.C. Colo.
LCivR 5.1G. Rule 5(a)(1)(D) requires that a written motion filed with the Court must be served on
every party. Local Rule 5.1G requires, in pertinent part, that “[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex
parte, shall be accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name
and address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service.” The attachment to
Plaintiff’s motion provides the names and addresses of the named Defendants, but does not indicate
service on these parties or their counsel of record.