Farmer v. Banco Popular of North America

Filing 240

ORDER Granting 237 Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North Americans Motion for Turnover Order to the extent that any membership interest of George L. Farmer in GRTM LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, is charged with payment of the Judgme nt entered by this Court in the amount of $50,824.53. George L. Farmer shall report and distribute to the Clerk of the Court any amounts that become due or distributable to him by reason of any interest he holds in GRTM LLC until the Judgment is satisfied in full, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/26/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01268-WYD-MEH GEORGE FARMER (a/k/a George L. Farmer), Plaintiff, v. BANCO POPULAR OF NORTH AMERICA; JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants. ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER is before the Court on Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North American’s Motion for Turnover Order (ECF No. 237), filed June 30, 2015. In this motion, Banco Popular North America moves the Court for entry of a Turnover Order against Plaintiff George Farmer, seeking a turnover of Plaintiff’s interest in GRTM LLC, or in the alternative, a Charging Order against any of Plaintiff’s distributions from GRTM. On September 19, 2014, final judgment was entered against Plaintiff in the amount of $53,079.53. Plaintiff appealed my order imposing costs and fees, and on June 30, 2015, the Tenth Circuit affirmed, but reduced the amount of the judgment from $53,079.53 to $50,824.53. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a) allows a judgment creditor to return to the district court where the judgment was entered to seek the court's assistance in enforcing the judgment. Gagan v. Monroe, 269 F.3d 871, 873 (7th Cir. 2001). Under Rule 69(a), the Court may enter a turnover order “in aid of execution” of the judgment, provided that it defers to state law to provide methods for collecting judgment. See United Int's Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., 210 F.3d 1207, 1235 (10th Cir. 2000). Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 69(g) provides: The court, master, or referee may order any party or other person over whom the court has jurisdiction, to apply any property other than real property, not exempt from execution, whether in the possession of such party or other person, or owed the judgment debtor, towards satisfaction of the judgment. Any party or person who disobeys an order made under the provisions of this Rule may be punished for contempt. Nothing in this Rule shall be construed to prevent an action in the nature of a creditor's bill. Id. Based on my careful review of the pending motion, response, and reply, I find that a Charging Order is the proper relief. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North American’s Motion for Turnover Order (ECF No. 237) is GRANTED to the extent that any membership interest of George L. Farmer in GRTM LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, is charged with payment of the Judgment entered by this Court in the amount of $50,824.53. George L. Farmer shall report and distribute to the Clerk of the Court any amounts that become due or distributable to him by reason of any interest he holds in GRTM LLC until the Judgment is satisfied in full. Payments should be made to the following address: Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse Clerk’s Office, Room A105 901 19th Street Denver, CO 80294-3589 Upon receipt of any such payments, the Clerk shall provide notice of such receipt to -2- counsel for Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North America. The Judgment Creditor shall be entitled to receipt of the funds held by the Clerk upon written request by the Judgment Creditor. Dated: August 26, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Senior United States District Judge -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?