Farmer v. Banco Popular of North America
Filing
240
ORDER Granting 237 Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North Americans Motion for Turnover Order to the extent that any membership interest of George L. Farmer in GRTM LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, is charged with payment of the Judgme nt entered by this Court in the amount of $50,824.53. George L. Farmer shall report and distribute to the Clerk of the Court any amounts that become due or distributable to him by reason of any interest he holds in GRTM LLC until the Judgment is satisfied in full, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/26/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01268-WYD-MEH
GEORGE FARMER (a/k/a George L. Farmer),
Plaintiff,
v.
BANCO POPULAR OF NORTH AMERICA;
JOHN DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North
American’s Motion for Turnover Order (ECF No. 237), filed June 30, 2015. In this
motion, Banco Popular North America moves the Court for entry of a Turnover Order
against Plaintiff George Farmer, seeking a turnover of Plaintiff’s interest in GRTM LLC,
or in the alternative, a Charging Order against any of Plaintiff’s distributions from GRTM.
On September 19, 2014, final judgment was entered against Plaintiff in the
amount of $53,079.53. Plaintiff appealed my order imposing costs and fees, and on
June 30, 2015, the Tenth Circuit affirmed, but reduced the amount of the judgment from
$53,079.53 to $50,824.53.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a) allows a judgment creditor to return to the
district court where the judgment was entered to seek the court's assistance in enforcing
the judgment. Gagan v. Monroe, 269 F.3d 871, 873 (7th Cir. 2001). Under Rule 69(a),
the Court may enter a turnover order “in aid of execution” of the judgment, provided that
it defers to state law to provide methods for collecting judgment. See United Int's
Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., 210 F.3d 1207, 1235 (10th Cir. 2000). Colorado
Rule of Civil Procedure 69(g) provides:
The court, master, or referee may order any party or other person
over whom the court has jurisdiction, to apply any property other than real
property, not exempt from execution, whether in the possession of such
party or other person, or owed the judgment debtor, towards satisfaction
of the judgment. Any party or person who disobeys an order made under
the provisions of this Rule may be punished for contempt. Nothing in this
Rule shall be construed to prevent an action in the nature of a creditor's
bill.
Id.
Based on my careful review of the pending motion, response, and reply, I find
that a Charging Order is the proper relief. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North American’s Motion for
Turnover Order (ECF No. 237) is GRANTED to the extent that any membership interest
of George L. Farmer in GRTM LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, is charged
with payment of the Judgment entered by this Court in the amount of $50,824.53.
George L. Farmer shall report and distribute to the Clerk of the Court any amounts that
become due or distributable to him by reason of any interest he holds in GRTM LLC
until the Judgment is satisfied in full. Payments should be made to the
following address:
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse
Clerk’s Office, Room A105
901 19th Street
Denver, CO 80294-3589
Upon receipt of any such payments, the Clerk shall provide notice of such receipt to
-2-
counsel for Judgment Creditor Banco Popular North America. The Judgment Creditor
shall be entitled to receipt of the funds held by the Clerk upon written request by the
Judgment Creditor.
Dated: August 26, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?