Kerr et al v. Hickenlooper
ORDER Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Substitute Complaint ECF No. 18 , properly construed as moving to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Substitute Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; De fendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim. Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Plaintiffs other four claims for relief. Those four c laims will be allowed to proceed past the pleading stage in this action; Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Substitute Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief ECF No. 74 , is GRANTED; The Clerk of Court shall FIL E as a separate docket entry the Second Amended Substitute Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, currently filed as an attachment at ECF No. 74 . The Second Amended Substitute Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief will hereinafter be the operative complaint in this action; and The Courts Order staying disclosures and discovery in this action ECF No. 29 is VACATED and said stay is hereby LIFTED, by Judge William J. Martinez on 7/30/2012.(ervsl, )
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?