Obando v. Zavaras et al

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER denying 21 Motion to Compel "Martinez Report", by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/3/2012.(jjpsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01372-CMA-KLM ALEX OBANDO, Plaintiff, v. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, DOC Executive Director, TOM CLEMENTS, DOC Executive Director, SUSAN JONES, CSP Warden, MICHELLE NYCZ, Classification Chairperson, JAMES OLSON, Committee Chairperson, DAN DENNIS, Committee Member, and JOHN DOE, CSP Assistant Administrative Head, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel “Martinez Report” [Docket No. 21; Filed December 27, 2011] (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks a Court Order compelling Defendants to file specified documents with the Court. However, a scheduling conference has not yet occurred in this matter. Thus, requests for discovery are premature. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Further, once the period for discovery has commenced, Plaintiff must first make such requests for discovery materials directly to Defendants. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. To the extent that Plaintiff is seeking copies of documents to assist the Court in resolving the pending Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 15; Filed November 21, 2011], the request is not appropriate. Plaintiff has already responded to the Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 18; Filed December 19, 2011; Docket No. 19; Filed December 27, 2011] Further, the Court has the ability to obtain appropriate documents if necessary for adjudication of the pending motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Dated: January 3, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?