Genetic Technologies Limited v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
191
MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/12/2011; 183 Motion to Stay is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The Court will issue a written order by the end of the week. (Court Reporter: FTR - Monique Wiles) (klmcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01389-WJM-KLM
Date: October 12, 2011
GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom C-204
Byron G. Rogers United States
Courthouse
Courtroom Deputy, Monique Wiles
Benjamin Baughman Lieb
Hiwot M. Covell
Robert R. Brunelli
Plaintiff(s),
v.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
EUROFINS STA LABORATORIES, INC.
HOLOGIC, INC.
MERIAL, L.L.C
PFIZER, INC.
454 LIFE SCIENCES CORPORATION
GENESEEK, INC.
Aaron S. Jacobs (by phone)
Christopher J. Harnett (by phone)
David B. Wilson
Matthew E. Johnson
Tracey C. Allen (by phone)
Ryan J. Fletcher
David W. Nelmark (by phone)
David B. Wilson
Bruce A. Featherstone
John P. Elsevier (by phone)
Stephen C. Holmes (by phone)
Grantland G. Drutchas
Nancy G. Tinsley (by phone)
Anita G. Fox (by phone)
Defendant(s).
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTIONS HEARING
Court in Session: 10:05 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
This matter is before the Court regarding Defendants’ Motion for a Stay and to
Vacate Scheduling Conference and Related Pre-Conference Deadlines [Docket
No. 183, filed 10/5/2011].
Counsel present arguments.
It is ORDERED:
Defendants’ Motion for a Stay and to Vacate Scheduling
Conference and Related Pre-Conference Deadlines
[Docket No. 183, filed 10/5/2011] is TAKEN UNDER
ADVISEMENT. The Court will issue a written order by the
end of the week.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess: 10:51 a.m.
Total In-Court Time: 46 minutes
To order a transcript of this proceeding, contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?