Genetic Technologies Limited v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 80

MINUTE ORDER granting 70 Defendant Merial LLCs Unopposed Motion for Leave to Have One of Its Counsel Appear by Telephone at the Preliminary Scheduling Conference ; granting 73 Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc.s Unopposed Motion to Appear by Te lephone at the Rule 16(a) Scheduling Conference ; granting 76 Defendant Neogen Corporations Unopposed Motion for Permission to Attend Preliminary Scheduling Conference by Telephone ; granting 78 Defendant Hologic, Incs Unopposed Motion to Appear by Telephone at Preliminary Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/9/2011.(erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01389-WJM-KLM
GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, an Australian corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
EUROFINS STA LABORATORIES, INC., a Colorado corporation,
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, a British company,
HOLOGIC, INC., a Delaware corporation,
MERIAL L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,
NAVIGENICS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
NEOGEN CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation,
PFIZER INC., a Delaware corporation, and
454 LIFE SCIENCES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Merial LLC’s Unopposed Motion for
Leave to Have One of Its Counsel Appear by Telephone at the Preliminary
Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 70; Filed August 8, 2011]; Defendant Agilent
Technologies, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Appear by Telephone at the Rule 16(a)
Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 73; Filed August 9, 2011]; Defendant Neogen
Corporation’s Unopposed Motion for Permission to Attend Preliminary Scheduling
Conference by Telephone [Docket No. 76; Filed August 9, 2011]; and Defendant Hologic,
Inc’s Unopposed Motion to Appear by Telephone at Preliminary Scheduling
Conference [Docket No. 78; Filed August 9, 2011] (collectively, the “Motions”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED. On the date and time
of the conference, counsel who have been given permission to appear by telephone shall
arrange a conference call and contact the Court on a single line at [phone] to
participate.
Dated: August 9, 2011