USA v. Scott et al

Filing 190

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), all claims by and between plaintiff and defendant are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This case shall be closed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/29/12. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 11-cv-01430-PAB-MEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH SCOTT, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL _____________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal [Docket No. 189] filed by the remaining parties in this matter, plaintiff United States of America and defendant Kenneth Scott. The parties “stipulate to dismiss this action, with prejudice.” The stipulation, however, was not signed by “by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see Anderson-Tully Co. v. Federal Ins. Co., 347 F. App’x 171, 176 (6th Cir. 2009) (under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “all parties who have appeared” includes both current and former parties). As a result, the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal, by itself, does not serve to dismiss this action. The Court, however, having reviewed the stipulation, finds that dismissal is appropriate. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), it is ORDERED that all claims by and between plaintiff and defendant are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. It is further ORDERED that this case shall be closed in its entirety. DATED March 29, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?