Huffman v. Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 228

MINUTE ORDER granting 226 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment Concerning Lack of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) 224 and to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 226 -1 on or before 7/6/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/5/12.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM LORAL HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALLRED, DR. CARTER, SANCHEZ, Case Manager, DERR, Unit Manager, JOHN DOE, Mailroom Supervisor, JANE DOE, Food Supervisor, BUCKNER, Investigator, LINCOLN, D.H.O., and CRANK, Trust Manager, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment Concerning Lack of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies [Docket No. 226; Filed June 4, 2012] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The motion for summary judgment and accompanying exhibits attached to the Motion are accepted for filing. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the motion for summary judgment and accompanying exhibits located at Docket Nos. 226-1 through 226-10 separately on the docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the acceptance of the instant motion for summary judgment and accompanying exhibits does not preclude Defendants from filing a subsequent motion for summary judgment on the merits, if necessary. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) [#224] and to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#226-1] on or before July 6, 2012. Dated: June 5, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?