Huffman v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
245
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 239 Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/18/12.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM
LORAL HUFFMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. ALLRED,
DR. CARTER,
SANCHEZ, Case Manager,
DERR, Unit Manager,
JOHN DOE, Mailroom Supervisor,
JANE DOE, Food Supervisor,
BUCKNER, Investigator,
LINCOLN, D.H.O., and
CRANK, Trust Manager,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Clarify [Docket No. 239;
Filed June 14, 2012] (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS
MOOT IN PART. The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT to the extent that Plaintiff requests
copies of the pending dispositive motions, in light of the Minute Order issued June 13, 2012
[#237], which directed the Clerk’s Office to mail to Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet and
a copy of the Amended Complaint [#70], Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) [#224], and the Certificate of Service indicating that these
documents have been mailed to Plaintiff [Docket No. 238; Entered June 13, 2012].
The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall respond to the two
dispositive motions on or before July 20, 2012. Plaintiff is again warned that his failure to
timely respond to the two pending dispositive motions will result in a Recommendation that
this matter be dismissed.
Dated: June 18, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?