Garza v. Astrue
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/10/2011. SS Defendants Brief due by 11/9/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 11/28/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 8/31/11. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01466-AP
SYLVIA M. GARZA,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
RUTH K. IRVIN
Irvin & Irvin
1443 Spruce St.
Boulder, CO 80302
Telephone: (303) 543-0337
Facsimile: (303) 543-0389
rkirvin@irvinlaw.net
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
KEVIN TRASKOS
Deputy Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
ALEXESS D. REA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1225 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7101
Facsimile: (303)454-0770
alexess.rea@ssa.gov
-1-
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 3, 2011
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: June 13, 2011
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 11, 2011
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
At this time, the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate; however, the
parties will fully ascertain the completeness of the record upon the drafting and completion of
their respective briefs.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties do not foresee offering any unusual claims or defenses in this case.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: October 10, 2011
B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: November 9, 2011
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: November 28, 2011
-2-
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff’s Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant’s Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
B.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with
D.C.Colo.LCivR. 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the
moving attorney’s client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 31st day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
________
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-3-
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
s/ Ruth K. Irvin
RUTH K. IRVIN
Irvin & Irvin
1443 Spruce St.
Boulder, CO 80302
Telephone: (303) 543-0337
Facsimile: (303) 543-0389
rkirvin@irvinlaw.net
KEVIN TRASKOS
Deputy Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Alexess D. Rea
ALEXESS D. REA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1225 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7101
Facsimile: (303) 454-0770
alexess.rea@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?