SOLIDFX LLC v. Jeppesen Sanderson Inc

Filing 308

RULING on Objections to Deposition Designations, by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/3/2014. (evana, ) (Modified on 4/3/2014 edited the title of the text to reflect that this is a RULING)(evana, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 11-cv-01468-WJM-BNB SOLIDFX, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC., Defendant. RULINGS ON OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS This matter is before the Court on the parties’ deposition designations and objections thereto. The objections to the following portions of the deposition designations are SUSTAINED: Page Number Lines Axel Friedrich, Ph.D 136 10-18 (including Exhibit 8) 137 1-18 138 1-18 161 2-22 162 1-22 163 1-22 164 1-22 165 1-22 166 1-22 167 1-12 315 2-22 316 1-20 Page Number Lines Michael D. Kolman 197 9-16 Lonne R. Lyon 244 16-18 245 4-8 Michelle Schopp 45 12-25 (including Exhibit 60) 46 1-25 47 1-25 48 1-25 49 1-3 57 4-25 (including Exhibit 63) 58 1-25 59 1-20 61 11-25 62 1-11 64 15-25 65 1-16 84 23-25 (including Exhibit 21) 85 1-25 86 1-25 87 1-11 89 1-5, 25 90 1-21 (including Exhibit 83) 96 14-25 97 1-6 139 18-25 (including Exhibit 173) 140 1-25 141 1-25 142 1-25 2 Page Number Lines Michelle Schopp (Con’t) 143 1-14 218 13-25 (including the portions of the email exchange that consist of Ms. Schopp’s statements or those of George Adams. Mr. Elia’s statements are non-hearsay and may be admissible if other portions are redacted.) 219 1-17 220 11-22 257 19-25 (including Exhibit 173) 258 1-24 Matthew T. Elia 207 5-21 (including the portions of the exhibit containing statements from a non-party. Mr. Elia’s statements are not hearsay) 208 1-22 209 1-4 210 7-22 (including the portions of the exhibit containing statements from a non-party. Mr. Elia’s and Ms. Flamme’s statements are not hearsay and may be admissible with redaction.) 211 15-22 212 1-12 213 8-20 214 11-22 (including the portions of the exhibit containing statements from a non-party. Mr. Elia’s and Mr. McDonald’s statements are not hearsay and may be admissible with redaction.) 215 1-22 216 1-22 217 1-3 (the portions of the exhibit containing statements from a non-party. Mr. Elia’s statements are not hearsay and may be admissible with redaction.) 218 16-22 3 Page Number Lines Matthew T. Elia (Con’t) 219 1-9 The portions of the above-designated deposition testimony to which the Court has sustained the objection should be redacted from the parties’ presentations. Additionally, the parties are free to eliminate any other designations, or portions of designations, that are no longer relevant and material to the issues to be tried, given the Court’s rulings on the objections herein, or any other ruling or order entered by the Court in this case. All other objections to the testimony of the above-referenced deponents are OVERRULED. Additionally, all objections to the deposition designations for Tyler N. Snow, George John, Ph.D, and Christopher Tyson Weihs are OVERRULED. Dated this 3rd day of April, 2014. BY THE COURT: William J. Martínez United States District Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?