Cox v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

Filing 35

ORDER. Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Compel is denied. Plaintiff's 33 Motion to File Reply is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing 32 Plaintiff's Reply. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/24/12.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01479-PAB-BNB
CORTEZ COX, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, a/k/a Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, a
Maryland corporation,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [Doc. # 24, filed 3/29/2012] (the “Motion to

Compel”); and
(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion to File Reply [Doc. # 33, filed 4/18/2012] (the “Motion to

Reply”).
I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 24] is DENIED;

(2)

The defendant’s request for sanctions in connection with the Motion to Compel is

DENIED, the Motion to Compel being substantially justified; and
(3)

The Motion to Reply [Doc. # 33] is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is

directed to accept for filing Plaintiff’s Reply [Doc. # 32].

Dated April 24, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2