McMinn v. Dodson et al

Filing 106

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's 92 Motion to Clarify Plaintiff's Motions That Have Been Stricken is granted in part. Plaintiff's 93 Motion for Information Regarding Filing Subpoenas is granted in part. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/23/12.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 11–cv–01511–PAB–KMT
GLENN McMINN,
Plaintiff,
v.
S.C.O. ROBERT DODSON, and
ALLEN BIRT,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Clarify Plaintiff’s Motions That Have Been Stricken” (Doc. No. 92, filed
January 25, 2012) is GRANTED in part. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, the court will
consider only a motion, response, and reply. The court need not consider other briefing.
Plaintiff’s “Motion for Information Regarding Filing Subpoenas” (Doc. No. 93, Filed January
25, 2012) is GRANTED in part. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to serve subpoenas, he must
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.
To the extent that Plaintiff seeks further clarification of this court’s orders, the court cannot
provide Plaintiff with legal advice; notwithstanding his pro se status, Plaintiff must conduct his
own legal research.
Dated: April 23, 2012