McMinn v. Dodson et al

Filing 148

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's 133 Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on October 28, 2011 Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Kennedy, and Plaintiff and Plaintiff's 134 Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on May 11, 2012, Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Johnson, and Plaintiff are denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/28/12.(mnfsl, ) Modified on 8/29/2012 to correct text (mnfsl, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 11–cv–01511–PAB–KMT GLENN McMINN, Plaintiff, v. S.C.O. ROBERT DODSON, and ALLEN BIRT, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff’s “Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on October 28, 2011 Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Kennedy, and Plaintiff” (Doc. No. 133, filed May 18, 2012) and Plaintiff’s “Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on May 11, 2012, Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Johnson, and Plaintiff” (Doc. No. 134, filed May 18, 2012) are DENIED as moot. All discovery deadlines set at the preliminary scheduling conference have passed, and thus there is no need for the plaintiff to review a CD from the preliminary scheduling conference. Likewise, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Dodson’s Motion for Sanctions has passed, and Plaintiff already filed his response on June 7, 2012, apparently without need for a CD recording of the hearing at issue. Finally, the court mailed Plaintiff the courtroom minutes for both hearings. Dated: August 28, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?