McMinn v. Dodson et al
Filing
148
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's 133 Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on October 28, 2011 Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Kennedy, and Plaintiff and Plaintiff's 134 Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on May 11, 2012, Between Judge Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Johnson, and Plaintiff are denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/28/12.(mnfsl, ) Modified on 8/29/2012 to correct text (mnfsl, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 11–cv–01511–PAB–KMT
GLENN McMINN,
Plaintiff,
v.
S.C.O. ROBERT DODSON, and
ALLEN BIRT,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on October 28, 2011 Between Judge
Tafoya, Defendant Attorney Kennedy, and Plaintiff” (Doc. No. 133, filed May 18, 2012) and
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Review Phone Conference Held on May 11, 2012, Between Judge Tafoya,
Defendant Attorney Johnson, and Plaintiff” (Doc. No. 134, filed May 18, 2012) are DENIED as
moot. All discovery deadlines set at the preliminary scheduling conference have passed, and
thus there is no need for the plaintiff to review a CD from the preliminary scheduling conference.
Likewise, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Dodson’s Motion for Sanctions has
passed, and Plaintiff already filed his response on June 7, 2012, apparently without need for a
CD recording of the hearing at issue. Finally, the court mailed Plaintiff the courtroom minutes
for both hearings.
Dated: August 28, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?