Nambe Pueblo Housing Entity v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) et al
Filing
16
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/30/2011 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. onSeptember 22, 2011, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/16/2011. (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01516-RPM
NAMBE PUEBLO HOUSING ENTITY,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(HUD),
SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of HUD,
SANDRA HENRIQUEZ, Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, and
DEBORAH LALANCETTE, Director, HUD’s Office of Grants Management, National Office
of Native American Programs,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
_____________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is
ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on September 30, 2011, at 11:00 a.m.
in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street,
Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling
Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx (Senior Judge
Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 1/08). The
proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on
September 22, 2011.
The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person.
representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.
DATED: August 16th, 2011
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
No parties or
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?