Nambe Pueblo Housing Entity v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) et al

Filing 36

ORDER re: 35 Motion. Court shall receive as evidence in consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction: [17-1], [29-3], [18-1], [18-2] and [35-1] (see Order), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/20/2012.(rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-1516-RPM NAMBE PUEBLO HOUSING ENTITY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD), SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of HUD, SANDRA HENRIQUEZ, Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, DEBORAH LALANCETTE, Director, HUD’s Office of Grants Management, National Office of Native American Programs, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ For sufficient cause shown, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Allow for Presentation of Evidence by Declaration (Dkt. No. 35). The Court shall receive the following as evidence in consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:  The affidavits of Christine Brock attached to Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Reply, including an attached exhibit (Dkt. Nos. 17-1 and 29-3); and  The declarations of Deborah A. Lalancette, Robert Holden, and Jacqueline Kruszek, including an attached exhibit, attached to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 1   (Dkt. No. 18-1 and 18-2) or attached to the Motion to Allow for Presentation of Evidence by Declaration (Dkt. No. 35-1). BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch Dated: January 20, 2012 ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch United States Senior District Judge 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?