Nambe Pueblo Housing Entity v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) et al

Filing 37

Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/24/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 17 , is denied. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: January 24, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 11-cv-01516-RPM NAMBE PUEBLO HOUSING ENTITY, Joseph Fredericks, III Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Timothy B, Jafek OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(HUD), SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of HUD, SANDRA HENRIQUEZ, Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, and DEBORAH LALANCETTE, Director, HUD’s Office of Grants Management, National Office of Native American Programs, Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction 10:00 a.m. Court in session. Defendants’ representative Perrin N. Wright present. Court’s preliminary remarks. Counsel answer questions. Mr. Fredericks states plaintiff is seeking preliminary injunction for the years 2011 and 2012 through 2015 (monetary repayment / withholding, disbursement to Nambe Pueblo - money set aside). Argument by Mr. Fredericks. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [17], is denied. Mr. Jafek answers questions asked by the Court regarding scheduling. Counsel agree to try to expedite briefing. 10:22 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 22 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?