Taylor Moving, LLC v. Voigt et al

Filing 13

ORDER : The defendants may have to and including December 2, 2011, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Verified Complaint. Supplemental Scheduling Conference set for 1/17/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. The parties shall prepare and submit a proposed Scheduling Order on or before January 10, 2012, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/2/11. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 11-cv-01540-WYD-BNB TAYLOR MOVING, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL VOIGT, an individual, OPM ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Pride Worldwide Moving & Storage, d/b/a Boulder Valley Transfer, a Colorado corporation, TAYLOR MOVING, INC., a Colorado corporation, and TAYLOR MOVING AND STORAGE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The plaintiff and defendant Michael Voight appeared this morning for a scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order was refused because it did not contain any input from the defendants. Consistent with matters discussed at the scheduling conference, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The defendants may have to and including December 2, 2011, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Verified Complaint; (2) A supplemental scheduling conference is set for January 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado; and (3) The parties shall prepare and submit a proposed Scheduling Order on or before January 10, 2012. Dated November 2, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?