Clark et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 Joint Motion to Remand; Denying as moot 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. This case is REMANDED to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv2395; by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/22/2011.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01542-WJM-CBS
SCOTT M. CLARK, and
SHINOBU A. CLARK
Plaintiffs,
v.
U.S. BANK N.A., as Trustee for the Holders of Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust
2005-4 in a Securitization Transaction Pursuant to a Trust Agreement Dated April 1,
2005;
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS AS SPONSOR, SELLER AND INVESTMENT
BANKER;
AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC AS MASTER SERVICER;
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC AS SERVICER;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.;
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF DENVER COUNTY;
JOHN AND JANE DOES, INDIVIDUAL CORPORATIONS, AND ANY OTHER FORM
OF LEGAL ENTITY 1 THROUGH INFINITY, unknown defendants;
Defendants
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION AND STIPULATION TO
REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Unopposed Motion and
Stipulation to Remand Action to the State Court. (ECF No. 42.) The Court having
reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion to
Remand.
It is therefore ORDERED:
1)
This case is REMANDED to the District Court for the City and County of
Denver, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv2395;
2)
Each party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and
3)
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand, ECF No. 23, is DENIED as moot.
Dated this 22nd day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?