Clark et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER granting 42 Joint Motion to Remand; Denying as moot 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. This case is REMANDED to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv2395; by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/22/2011.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 11-cv-01542-WJM-CBS SCOTT M. CLARK, and SHINOBU A. CLARK Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BANK N.A., as Trustee for the Holders of Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust 2005-4 in a Securitization Transaction Pursuant to a Trust Agreement Dated April 1, 2005; LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS AS SPONSOR, SELLER AND INVESTMENT BANKER; AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC AS MASTER SERVICER; CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC AS SERVICER; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF DENVER COUNTY; JOHN AND JANE DOES, INDIVIDUAL CORPORATIONS, AND ANY OTHER FORM OF LEGAL ENTITY 1 THROUGH INFINITY, unknown defendants; Defendants _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION AND STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT _____________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Unopposed Motion and Stipulation to Remand Action to the State Court. (ECF No. 42.) The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion to Remand. It is therefore ORDERED: 1) This case is REMANDED to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv2395; 2) Each party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand, ECF No. 23, is DENIED as moot. Dated this 22nd day of August, 2011. BY THE COURT: _______________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?