Martinez v. City of Colorado Springs et al

Filing 51

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation For Partial Dismissal With Prejudice 49 1/13/2012, APPROVED. The Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice 50 filed 1/13/2012, is APPROVED. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 9/7/2012, and the jury trial set to commence 9/24/2012, are VACATED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/17/2012. (sahsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-01556-REB-MJW JARROTT MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a municipality, SYDNEY HUFFMAN, an individual, and MICHAEL JELMO, an individual, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The following matters are before me for consideration: (1) the Stipulation For Partial Dismissal With Prejudice [#49]1; and (2) the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice [#50] both filed January 13, 2012. After reviewing the stipulations and the file, I conclude that the stipulations should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation For Partial Dismissal With Prejudice [#49] January 13, 2012, APPROVED; 2. That the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice [#50] filed January 13, 2012, is APPROVED; 1 “[#49]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 3. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for September 7, 2012, and the jury trial set to commence September 24, 2012, are VACATED; and 4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. Dated January 17, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?