Martinez v. City of Colorado Springs et al
Filing
51
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation For Partial Dismissal With Prejudice 49 1/13/2012, APPROVED. The Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice 50 filed 1/13/2012, is APPROVED. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 9/7/2012, and the jury trial set to commence 9/24/2012, are VACATED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/17/2012. (sahsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01556-REB-MJW
JARROTT MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a municipality,
SYDNEY HUFFMAN, an individual, and
MICHAEL JELMO, an individual,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The following matters are before me for consideration: (1) the Stipulation For
Partial Dismissal With Prejudice [#49]1; and (2) the Stipulation For Dismissal With
Prejudice [#50] both filed January 13, 2012. After reviewing the stipulations and the
file, I conclude that the stipulations should be approved and that this action should be
dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation For Partial Dismissal With Prejudice [#49] January 13,
2012, APPROVED;
2. That the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice [#50] filed January 13,
2012, is APPROVED;
1
“[#49]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
3. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for September 7, 2012, and the jury
trial set to commence September 24, 2012, are VACATED; and
4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected
parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs.
Dated January 17, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?