Loose v. Kogousek et al
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 26 Notice of Appeal by Earl Loose, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/20/11. (bjr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01634-LTB
EARL JOSEPH LOOSE a/k/a EARL CROWNHART,
DANIEL C. KOGOUSEK, and
JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY
Babcock, Senior Judge
Applicant submitted a Notice of Appeal on October 18, 2011. The court has
determined that the document is deficient as described in this order. Applicant will be
directed to cure the following if he wishes to pursue this appeal.
X is not submitted
Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action:
is not submitted
is missing affidavit
is missing required financial information
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Applicant cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30)
days from the date of this order. Any papers that Applicant files in response to this order
must include the civil action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Applicant, together with a
copy of this order, an original and one copy of the following forms: Prisoner's Motion and
Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App.
P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies
within 30 days from the date of this order, the court of appeals will be so notified.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this
day of October, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?