R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC v. Telluride Regional Airport Authority

Filing 54

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 the Stipulated Motion for Clarification of the Court's August 24, 2012 Order. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss due by 11/14/2012. Defendant's reply in support of the motion to dismiss due by 11/28/2012. Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's written discovery due by 11/23/2012. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/10/2012. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01658-WJM-MEH R.E. MONKS CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, on behalf of Fisher Sand & Gravel Co., d/b/a Arizona Drilling & Blasting, Plaintiff, v. TELLURIDE REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 10, 2012. The Stipulated Motion for Clarification of the Court’s August 24, 2012 Order [filed September 6, 2012; docket #52] is granted in part and denied in part as follows. The parties seek clarification with respect to their request to “stay” the Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s motion to dismiss and discovery requests. As set forth in this Court’s August 24, 2012 order, the Court stated, “All other relief sought by the parties in the present motion is denied.” The Court finds that an indefinite “stay” is not proper under the circumstances (see D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1D); however, to assist the parties in their pursuit of a pretrial resolution in this matter, the Court will extend the deadlines for Plaintiff’s responses as follows: Response to Motion to Dismiss: Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss: P’s responses to D’s written discovery: November 14, 2012 November 28, 2012 November 23, 2012 The Court will grant no further extension of these deadlines absent a showing of exceptional cause.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?