Nival v. Clements et al
Minute ORDER granting 63 Request [for] Reconsideration of the Court's Denial to (sic) Plaintiff's Preliminary Injunction. Docket #57 is withdrawn. Each Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 55 on or before 6/4/12, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/14/12.(lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH
DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider,
JUDY BREZENDINE, CCCF Clinical Services Director,
LYNN THOMPSON, CCCF Nurse Practitioner,
JANE DOE #1 (SANDY), JANE DOE #2 (MARY), and JANE DOE #3 (CHRISTIE), NURSING
STAFF, all in their official and individual capacities,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 14, 2012.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff[’s] Request [for] Reconsideration of the Court’s Denial
to (sic) Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction (Doc #55) [filed May 10, 2012; docket #63]. I construe
Plaintiff’s “Request” as a Motion to Reconsider my Order dated April 27, 2012, which denied
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction on the ground that Plaintiff did not properly serve the
motion on all parties. Because Plaintiff has provided colorable evidence that he in fact served the
Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Docket #57 is withdrawn and, to that extent, Docket #63 is
granted. Each Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
[docket #55] on or before June 4, 2012. Plaintiff may file a single reply in support of the Motion
fourteen (14) days after the last response is served.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?