Nival v. Clements et al

Filing 79

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 77 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/19/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH
PEDRO NIVAL,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider,
JUDY BREZENDINE, CCCF Clinical Services Director,
LYNN THOMPSON, CCCF Nurse Practitioner,
JANE DOE #1 (SANDY), JANE DOE #2 (MARY), and JANE DOE #3 (CHRISTIE), NURSING
STAFF, all in their official and individual capacities,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 19, 2012.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [filed June 15 2012; docket #77] is denied
without prejudice, as Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a copy of the proposed amended
complaint. If Plaintiff wishes to renew his request, he must include with his motion copy of the
proposed amended complaint so that the Court may determine whether justice so requires leave to
amend. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).
With respect to Plaintiff’s “two-fold question” regarding the appropriate litigation strategy,
the Court reminds Plaintiff that it will not provide legal advice to any party, pro se or otherwise.