Freeman v. Woolston et al

Filing 142

Minute ORDER granting 137 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 129) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(c). ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Request and Order Entered Concerning Material Restricted from Plaintiffs Possession by Order (Doc. 69) Sent to the United States District Court 138 is denied, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/15/12.(lygsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW
MARCUS L. FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and
LIKEN, Education Department,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to
Respond to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 129) Pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(c) (Docket No. 137) is granted. It is thus further
ORDERED that plaintiff shall have up to and including September 27, 2012, to
file a response to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 129). It
is further
ORDERED that the defendants shall have up to and including September 27,
2012, to file a response to the Plaintiff’s Dispositive Motion (Docket No. 135).
It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Request and Order Entered
Concerning Material Restricted from Plaintiffs Possession by Order (Doc. 69) Sent to
the United States District Court (Docket No. 138) is denied. Defense counsel has
represented to the court that she is in the process of properly authenticating the video
footage and providing it to the court. (See Docket No. 140 at 2). Therefore, the court
order requested by the plaintiff is unnecessary.
Date: August 15, 2012