Huang et al v. Marklyn Group Inc

Filing 162

JUDGMENT from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Ciscuit re: 145 Notice of Appeal, filed by Yao-Hung Huang, Big Time Auto Parts Manufacturing Inc. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PE R CURIAM (OMALLEY, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. by United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on 2/4/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Judgment, # 2 Information Sheet, # 3 Questions and Answers Information sheet) (evana, )

Case: 15-1587

Document: 50-1

Page: 1

Filed: 02/04/2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT WITHOUT OPINION
JUDGMENT ENTERED: 02/04/2016
The judgment of the court in your case was entered today pursuant to Rule 36. This Court affirmed the judgment
or decision that was appealed. None of the relief sought in the appeal was granted. No opinion accompanied the
judgment. The mandate will be issued in due course.
Information is also provided about petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc. The questions and answers
are those frequently asked and answered by the Clerk's Office.
Costs are taxed against the appellant in favor of the appellee under Rule 39. The party entitled to costs is
provided a bill of costs form and an instruction sheet with this notice.
The parties are encouraged to stipulate to the costs. A bill of costs will be presumed correct in the absence of a
timely filed objection.
Costs are payable to the party awarded costs. If costs are awarded to the government, they should be paid to
the Treasurer of the United States. Where costs are awarded against the government, payment should be made to
the person(s) designated under the governing statutes, the court's orders, and the parties' written settlement
agreements. In cases between private parties, payment should be made to counsel for the party awarded costs or, if
the party is not represented by counsel, to the party pro se. Payment of costs should not be sent to the court. Costs
should be paid promptly.
If the court also imposed monetary sanctions, they are payable to the opposing party unless the court's opinion
provides otherwise. Sanctions should be paid in the same way as costs.
Regarding exhibits and visual aids: Your attention is directed to FRAP 34(g) which states that the clerk may
destroy or dispose of the exhibits if counsel does not reclaim them within a reasonable time after the clerk gives
notice to remove them. (The clerk deems a reasonable time to be 15 days from the date the final mandate is issued.)

FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court

15-1587 - Huang v. Marklyn Group, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:11-cv-01765-REB-NYW