Calbart v. Crum

Filing 65

ORDER. ORDERED that the 64 recommendation is accepted and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 38 is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint 44 is DENIED, and Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant Dr. Crum and against Plaintiff Mr. Calbart, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/6/12.(lygsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01771-LTB-CBS
ERNIE CALBART, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MEDICAL DIRECTOR DR. CRUM, sued in his individual capacit[y],
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and
served on August 21, 2012 (Doc 64). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc 38) is GRANTED, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc
44) is DENIED, and Judgment on the Amended Complaint (Doc 8) shall be entered in favor
of Defendant Dr. Crum and against Plaintiff Mr. Calbart.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:

September 6, 2012