Trezise v. Hoang

Filing 21

ORDER. The 4 Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge, entered by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/15/2011 is VACATED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/2/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/02/2011. (wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 11–cv–01825–KMT–KLM JAMES TREZISE, Plaintiff, v. QUYNH HOANG, M.D., Defendant. ORDER This case was referred by Order of Reference Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by Judge R. Brooke Jackson and was assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on November 30, 2011. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), it is hereby ORDERED that the Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge, entered by Judge William J. Martínez on July 15, 2011 ([Docket No. 4), is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that a Final Pretrial Conference is set for July 2, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit their proposed Final Pretrial Order to U.S. Magistrate Judge Tafoya five (5) business days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference date. All other deadlines and hearings set by the Scheduling Order shall remain in effect, unless reset by further Order of the Court. The parties shall prepare the proposed Final Pretrial Order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the Court’s website at Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. Parties who are pro se or do not have access to the internet may visit the Clerk’s Office at the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Room A-105, Denver, Colorado. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2011. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?