Young v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Filing 200

MINUTE ORDER 169 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Protective Order Regarding the Location of Opt-In Plaintiffs' Depositions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law Motion for Protective Order is MOOT and therefore DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/2/12.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No.

11-cv-01840-REB-MJW

TAYNA YOUNG, on her own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Protective Order
Regarding the Location of Opt-In Plaintiffs’ Depositions and Incorporated Memorandum
of Law (docket no. 169) is MOOT and therefore DENIED.
On March 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Watanabe entered his ORDER
REGARDING OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS’ ALISHA KELLEY, QUINALA YOUNG, ADAM
HADDOCK,
JERRY GOODWIN, LETTI HAYDEN, KIM HIGLEY, YOLANDA JOHNSON,
CHRISTOPHER KUNN, DAVID KERSCHKE, TANISHA MOFFETT, JOHNNY
ROLDAN, JAMIE RUSE, JANET RUSSELL, DAVID SANTIAGO, DENISE
SUSTERICH, KONRAD VENDRAK, AND GABRIEL THOMAS MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE LOCATION OF DEPOSITIONS AND
INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW (DOCKET NO. 149). See docket no.
161.
On March 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed her OBJECTIONS to Magistrate Judge
Watanabe’s Order [docket no. 161] (docket no. 168). After filing her OBJECTIONS
(docket no. 168), the Plaintiff then filed the subject motion (docket no. 169). In essence,
the same relief is sought by Plaintiff in both motions (docket nos. 168 and 169). That
filing an OBJECTION to Magistrate Judge Watanabe’s Order (docket no. 161) is
consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 is procedurally correct. The filing of Plaintiff’s
Renewed Motion for Protective Order Regarding the Location of Opt-In Plaintiffs’
Depositions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (docket no. 169) is procedurally
incorrect.
Date: May 2, 2012