Ross et al v. John and Jane Does 1-5

Filing 25

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Status Conference held on 10/13/2011, granting 22 Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to 1) Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference and 2) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Subpoenas. Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Plaintiffs shall be allowed to issue five (5) additional subpoenas. (FTR: C. Coomes -- FTR Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01877-MSK-MEH
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes

Date: October 13, 2011
FTR – Courtroom A501

S. JAWN ROSS and
S. JAWN ROSS, PC,

William Slamkowski

Plaintiffs,
vs.
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5,

(No appearance)

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MOTION HEARING
Court in session:

9:53 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearance of counsel.
Discussion regarding the status of the case. Mr. Slamkowski requests leave to serve an additional
five (5) subpoenas.
ORDERED: For reason stated on the record, Plaintiffs’ Combined Motion to 1) Vacate and
Reset Scheduling Conference and 2) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional
Subpoenas (Doc. 22, filed 10/6/11) is GRANTED.
•

The Scheduling Conference is reset for November 17, 2011, at 9:45 a.m.
(Counsel for the parties in this case are to hold a pre-scheduling
conference meeting and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before October 27, 2011.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), no discovery shall be submitted until
after the pre-scheduling conference meeting, unless otherwise ordered or
directed by the Court.
The parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk’s
Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing
(“ECF”) Procedures V.L., no later than five (5) business days prior to
the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to
be submitted in a useable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect only) by
email to Magistrate Judge Hegarty at
[e-mail].

The parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in
accordance with the form which may be downloaded from the
Standardized Order Forms section of the Court’s website, found at
http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx. All Scheduling Conferences
held before a Magistrate Judge utilize the same scheduling order format,
regardless of the District Judge assigned to the case.)
•

The Court authorizes the issuance of five (5) additional subpoenas, for the
purpose of obtaining the identity of the individuals posting allegedly
defamatory statements on the internet regarding Plaintiffs.

Court in recess:
9:58 a.m. (Hearing concluded)
Total time in court: 0:05