Patterson v. Santini et al

Filing 101

MINUTE ORDER granting 98 Motion for Leave to appear by video conference or telephone, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/27/2014.(trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01899-RM-KLM
GERALD LEE PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEORGE SANTINI, M.D.,
CAMACHO, P.A., and
FIVE JOHN/JANE DOES,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Permission to Appear
at the March 6, 2014, [sic] by Video Conference [#98]1 (the “Motion”). Defendants
request an order from the Court authorizing Defendants Santini and Camacho to attend the
March 6, 2014 Settlement Conference in this matter by video conference or telephone.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#98] is GRANTED. The Court reminds
Defendants’ counsel that he must provide the telephone or other equipment for Defendants
Santini’s and Camacho’s appearances. Counsel is directed to review D.C.COLO.LCivR
83.1 for the rules regarding cameras and recording devices, including cellular telephones,
in the United States Courthouse.
Dated: February 27, 2014

1

“[#98]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.