Patterson v. Santini et al

Filing 127

ORDER re: 126 USCA Order; the Court ORDERS that all claims against the above named Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall pay their own costs and fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/28/2015. (cthom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01899-RM-KLM
GERALD LEE PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEORGE SANTINI, M.D.,
CAMACHO, P.A., and
FIVE JOHN/JANE DOES,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the Order for Clarification (ECF No. 126) filed by the
Tenth Circuit. The Order for Clarification directs a limited remand to this Court to clarify the
status of final judgment in this case, which is currently administratively closed. (See ECF No.
104.) For all the reasons explained in this Court’s Order entered on April 15, 2015 (ECF No.
120) this Court concludes that a continuation of the administrative closure in this matter is
unnecessary and does not advance its final resolution.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the Court ORDERS that all
claims against the above named Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall
pay their own costs and fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

DATED this 28th day of October, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2