Anderson v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 50

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re: 49 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. The Complaint and the claims of the plaintiff asserted against the defendants in the above-captioned civil action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs, fees and expenses. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/4/12. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01911-CMA-KMT
KAREN ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. a/k/a J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND COMPANY, its Known
and Unknown Partners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Successors, Heirs and Assigns;
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, its Known and Unknown Partners, Contractors,
Subcontractors, Successors, Heirs and Assigns;
ALL MAINTENANCE COMPANIES KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PARTNERS,
CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, SUCCESSORS, HEIRS AND ASSIGNS;
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, WHOSE TRUE IDENTITIES ARE UNKNOWN,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
______________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice
(Doc. # 49), filed on June 4, 2012. The Complaint and the claims of the plaintiff
asserted against the defendants in the above-captioned civil action are hereby
dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs, fees and expenses.
DATED: June 4, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

__________________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge