Kipling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 165

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and against Kathryn Kipling re: 164 Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, on 02/04/16. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Case No. 11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS KATHRYN KIPLING, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, doing business as, Minnesota Division of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Memorandum Opion and Order entered by the Honorable Nina Y. Wang on February 3, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc # 146) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 9doc. # 149) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and against Plaintiff, Kathryn Kipling. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company shall have its costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1, with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 4th day of February, 2016. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/ N. Marble N. Marble, Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?