Kipling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
165
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and against Kathryn Kipling re: 164 Memorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, on 02/04/16. (nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Case No. 11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS
KATHRYN KIPLING,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, doing business as,
Minnesota Division of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the
Memorandum Opion and Order entered by the Honorable Nina Y. Wang on February 3,
2016, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc # 146) is
GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 9doc. # 149) is DENIED.
FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of
Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and against Plaintiff,
Kathryn Kipling. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Company shall have its costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
58 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1, with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of
entry of judgment. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Complaint and this civil action are
DISMISSED with prejudice.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this
4th
day of February, 2016.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
s/ N. Marble
N. Marble,
Deputy Clerk
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?