Kipling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Final Pretrial Conference held on 3/25/2013. 69 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Discovery is GRANTED. Status Conference set for 5/2/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Reply to 66 Motion to Reconsider is due by 4/1/13.FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Date: MARCH 25, 2013
FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401
Bradley A. Levin
Thomas G. Tasker
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
Franklin D. Patterson
Court in Session: 9:40 a.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Discussion held on  Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Discovery.
ORDERED:  Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Discovery is
Proposed Pretrial Order reviewed.
ORDERED: Parties agree to seat a jury of eight (8), with not less than six (6) deliberating.
Four day jury trial confirmed for May 13, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Parties allowed 20
minutes each for voir dire. Parties to submit proposed jury instructions,
verdict forms, and proposed voir dire on or before April 8, 2013.
Status conference to discuss instructions set for May 2, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
Revised exhibit lists, with Bates numbers, due at the conference.
Discussion held on trial procedures.
ORDERED: Reply to  Motion to Reconsider due by April 1, 2013.
Discussion held on whether to inform the jury on insurance limits or not. Parties are to be
prepared to discuss this again at the status conference on May 2, 2013.
Pretrial Order was approved and filed.
Court in Recess: 10:00 a.m. Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 00:20
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?