Hatch v. Sandgaard et al

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 17 Motion for Order Requiring Security. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/11/11.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM
STEPHEN T. HATCH, derivatively, on behalf of Zynex, Inc., formerly known as Zynex
Medical Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff,
v.
THOMAS SANDGAARD,
FRITZ G. ALLISON,
TAYLOR SIMONTON,
MARY BETH VITALE, and
Defendants,
ZYNEX, INC., a Nevada corporation,
Nominal Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Taylor Simonton (“Simonton”) and
Mary Beth Vitale’s (“Vitale”) Motion for Order Requiring Security [Docket No. 17; Filed
October 10, 2011] (the “Motion”). Defendants Simonton and Vitale have failed to comply
with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#17] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: October 11, 2011