International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division v. Frontier Airlines, Inc. et al

Filing 155

ORDER re: 154 Status Report filed by Republic Airways Holdings, Inc., Frontier Airlines, Inc. That Defendants shall submit a brief addressing the issue of standing within 20 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' brief is limited to six (6) pages, excluding the certificate of service, and that Plaintiff may file any response brief within 14 days of the service of Defendants brief, also limited to six (6) pages, excluding the certificate of service. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 6/17/2014. (trlee, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 11-cv-02007-RM-KLM INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION, Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS, INC., and FAPAINVEST, LLC, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Updated Status Report (ECF No. 154) which advised that an issue is raised as to whether Plaintiff International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, lacks standing in light of the recent election. Upon consideration of the Report, and being otherwise fully advised, is it ORDERED 1. That Defendants shall submit a brief addressing the issue of standing within 20 days of the date of this Order. Defendants’ brief is limited to six (6) pages, excluding the certificate of service; and 2. That Plaintiff may file any response brief within 14 days of the service of Defendant’s brief, also limited to six (6) pages, excluding the certificate of service. DATED this 17th day of June, 2014. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?