Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. CWDT, Inc et al

Filing 18

ORDER. The Parties Joint Motion to Administratively Close the Case, filed on 2/29/2012 17 is GRANTED. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 the Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned case be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/29/2012.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 11-cv-02027-WJM-KLM BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., BOCEPHUS MUSIC, INC., SCREEN GEMS-EMI MUSIC, INC., DALE MORRIS MUSIC, SONY/ATV SONGS LLC d/b/a SONY/ATV TREE PUBLISHING, RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., d/b/a IRVING MUSIC, WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORP., EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC., d/b/a EMI LONGITUDE MUSIC, SONGS of UNIVERSAL, INC., UNIVERSAL MUSIC MGB NA LLC d/b/a UNIVERSAL MUSIC CAREERS, and STEVE O’BRIEN MUSIC Plaintiffs, v. CWDT, INC., d/b/a COWBOYS/DOWNTOWN LANES, SAM GUADAGNOLI, individually, and KATHLEEN GUADAGNOLI, individually Defendants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion to Administratively Close the Case, filed on February 29, 2012 (ECF No. 17). The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows: The Parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 the Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned case be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Plaintiff may, however, seek to reopen this case for good cause shown. The Parties agree that in the event that the Defendants breach their payment obligations to the Plaintiffs under the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement, such event would constitute good cause to reopen this case under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. Dated this 29th day of February, 2012. BY THE COURT: _______________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?