Baldwin v. USA

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 18 , 19 Motions for Entry of a Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/17/2012.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02033-MSK-KLM CHARLES A. BALDWIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the parties’ competing Motions for Entry of a Protective Order [Docket No. 18; Filed January 11, 2012] and [Docket No. 19; Filed January 13, 2012] (the “Motions”). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order [#16] governing this case, the Motions are premature. See [#16] at 9, ¶ 8(d). The applicable provision states: No opposed discovery motions are to be filed with the Court until the parties comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. If the parties are unable to reach agreement on a discovery issue after conferring, they shall arrange a telephone hearing with Magistrate Judge Mix regarding this issue. Both of these steps must be completed before any contested discovery motions are filed with the Court. Id. (emphasis added). Neither party has arranged a conference call to set a hearing to resolve the instant discovery dispute. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that neither party shall file a contested discovery motion until after (1) unsuccessfully conferring with the other party pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., and (2) receiving leave from the Court to file the motion. To inquire about a hearing regarding a discovery dispute, the parties shall initiate a conference call and then, once all parties are on the line, dial the Court at 303-335-2770. Dated: January 17, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?