Rodgers v. TimeCentre, Inc. et al

Filing 52

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 2/24/2012. The court DENIES 32 Motion to Stay. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 3/2/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Counsel for the parties shall coordinate to create a conference call among themselves before contact the court (303.844.2117) at the scheduled time. (FTR: Robin Mason) (cbscd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action: 11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS Date: February 24, 2012 FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason Parties: Counsel: LAURA S. RODGERS, An individual, Richard Joshua Hood Plaintiff, v. TIMECENTRE, INC., a Colorado Corporation, DIMENSIONS GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, DIMENSIONS GROUP, LLC, a Georgia Company, and DIMENSIONS USA, INC., a Georgia Corporation, Edmund B. Moran, Jr. (Appearing by telephone) Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 1:33 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Mr. Moran, Jr. has not yet entered his appearance as counsel of record for the defendants. Discussion regarding defendant’s MOTION to Stay Further Discovery Pending Resolution Of Motion To Dismiss (Docket No. 32, filed on 1/4/2012) and defendant’s MOTION to Dismiss (Docket No. 14, filed on 9/27/2011). Court advises the parties that Judge Krieger has now referred the Motion to Dismiss to Magistrate Judge Shaffer resulting in a joinder of these two motions with respect to hearing any oral arguments on them at this hearing. Mr. Moran, Jr. advises the court that he is not prepared to make any oral arguments on the Motion to Dismiss. Discussion regarding claims for relief, claims of hostile work environment, and related case law. The court informs the parties that a recommendation can be made on the Motion to Dismiss which will likely be granted in part and denied in part. The court advises the parties that moving forward with discovery may be a good choice while awaiting a decision on the Motion to Dismiss. ORDERED: The court DENIES defendant's MOTION to Stay Further Discovery Pending Resolution Of Motion To Dismiss (Docket No. 32, filed on 1/4/2012). Discussion regarding the existing discovery cut off dates, experts, what discovery has been completed to date, and making an assessment of how to meet these existing discovery deadlines. ORDERED: The court sets a Telephonic Status Conference for March 2, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Parties shall be ready to discuss exactly how they wish to proceed with discovery. Counsel for the parties shall coordinate to create a conference call among themselves before contact the court (303.844.2117) at the scheduled time. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: Total time in court: 1:49 p.m. 00:16 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?