Rodgers v. TimeCentre, Inc. et al
ORDER re: 93 MOTION for Entry of Default as to TimeCentre, Inc. Defendant TimeCentre, Inc.'s Answer and Affirmative Defenses (filed 11/13/2012) (Doc. # 94 ) is STRICKEN. On or before 11/21/2012, Defendant TimeCentre, Inc. shall file either a motion to file its answer out of time or a response to Plaintiff's "Request [Motion] for Entry of Default TimeCentre, Inc." By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/13/2012. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS
LAURA S. RODGERS, an individual,
TIMECENTRE, INC, a Colorado Corporation, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff’s “Request [Motion] for Entry of
Default – TimeCentre, Inc.” Pursuant to the Order of Reference dated August 17, 2011 (Doc.
# 2) and the memorandum dated November 13, 2012 (Doc. # 95), this matter was referred to
the Magistrate Judge. The court having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion, the entire case file, and
the applicable law and being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that:
Defendant TimeCentre, Inc.’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses (filed November
13, 2012) (Doc. # 94) is STRICKEN as untimely filed.
On or before November 21, 2012, Defendant TimeCentre, Inc. shall file either a
motion to file its answer out of time or a response to Plaintiff’s “Request [Motion] for Entry of
Default – TimeCentre, Inc.”
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 13th day of November, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?